Blunt – The Conversation Agency »

Influence

January 2010

November 2009

  • I Love Me, I Really Really Love Me

    Mon 30th

    Personal brands have proliferated in the conversational marketing era. It’s the self-referential, self-promoting quality of the personal brand that I hate so much. Things like a radical imbalance between followed and followers (flock?) on twitter. It’s as if their corpus of knowledge is so vast that they don’t need to absord any new information from anyone else, while at the same time, they expect their fawning coterie of digital groupies to hang on every word they sputter out.

  • We all Sense the Ghost Tweeters

    Mon 16th

    As twitter gained mainstream recognition, it became de rigeur to be on there. Politicians, artists, sports agents–each segment saw in twitter a conversation stream in which they HAD to have a voice. But if twitter had not achieved such rapid growth, would the glitterati have flocked to it?

  • The Social Exchange Theory: What’s Your Net Worth?

    Sat 14th

    Twitter has no memory. Memes flare up, get to scale, and then peter out completely within days, sometimes hours. One of the criticisms levelled at twitter as a cogent communication medium is its stunning immediacy—an immediacy that doesn’t really care about what preceded it or what will follow it. These hyper-now flare-ups— ripples in the stream, as Nick Carr calls them—might seem dangerous at face value, but stick around for three more hours and they will have faded from the jet stream of collective human consciousness.

  • Remember the great website engagement debate?

    Tue 10th

    Remember the great website engagement debate? Remember all the hand-wringing and byte-spilling about formulas that were supposed to represent the holy grail of web analytics? Mercifully, the echoes of those debates have subsided. But now something new, and equally fatuous, has emerged: the concept of twitter influence.